Auto-Predict Upgrade Released - 04-10-25

bmehmet

The Auto-Predict upgrade has been released. Clear your CACHE ....A video will follow today.

https://lottodds.com/auto-predict?layout=mobile

tib5743

I have not seen any video

bmehmet

tib5743

Trying to find the time

bmehmet

One NOTE when playing DOUBLES. The PAIRS are either FRONT or BACK. FSB/FBA appears when the 3rd non-pair digit is in the past 3 winners. Because we organize the numbers in a BOX game LOW-to-HIGH.

$money$

bmehmet so can you reduce numbers based off that information?

bmehmet

@$money$#90168

Yes

You can extremely reduce the numbers. The example below shows only 7 double numbers could win.

Just like any other pattern. If you see 2-3 similar PAIR patterns hit back to back, it tends to flip to another PAIR pattern. For example, 2-3 FRONT pairs tend to flip to BACK pair. THUS, you play BACK pairs.

FSB+FBS or FSB+FSB

Also, when ever you have L1 & M3C having FSB+FBS or FSB+FSB, it means the past 3 winners contain all the digits of the winner. THUS, in the past winner, there must be 2 IDENTICAL digits to create the next double number. HOWEVER, DOUBLES give us a problem we must address in the near future.

NO HHH PAIRSUMS + FSB+FBS or FSB+FSB

FURTHERMORE, if the DOUBLE winner is with any of these Pairsums, it means the 1st digit of the double winner will start with a low digit (0-4). THUS, this can determine whether the double winner will be a BACK or FRONT pair.

NO HHH NUMBERS

7/3,2
8/2,2 - Most Popular
9/1,2 - Most Popular
11/1,3
10/3,2
10/2,3
12/3,3
NOTE: 7/2,3 has only one HHH (779)

https://forum.lottodds.com/d/10604-pairsums-that-do-not-have-hhh-numbers

PS9/1,2 and PS8/2,2

As you know these pairsums are the most popular. If you apply the above logic to them, you get the following result.

ODD BALLS

When applying the logic above to DOUBLES, you will get ODD BALLS like the following were the past 3 SINGLE number winners or isolating DOUBLES don't fit into the above logic all the time. We need to revisit this in the future to see if we can improve the logic when dealing with *DOUBLES and SINGLE numbers.

IN the WORST case, you have only ONE digit matching in the past 3 winners

EXAMPLES of the DOUBLE PROBLEM

EXAMPLE #1

EXAMPLE #2

SOLUTION: DOUBLES VIEW / FILTERS

We could create a BUTTON on the CHARTS that switches the view to DOUBLES and contains unique double symbols. This would also require creating dedicated DOUBLE FILTERS to match that CHART.

CONCLUSION (Best Strategy)

Because of this issue, we grouped the DOUBLE numbers into certain PAIR symbols so the symbols will always produce those doubles for a win. However, applying the current PAIR symbol logic to the DOUBLES is the problem we need to address later.

THEREFORE, the best strategy is to simply determine if the DOUBLE will be a FRONT or BACK pair. This will tell you whether to play FSB+B / B+FSB or FBS+F / F+FBS

$money$

bmehmet very informational stuff. Is that why you didn't add the FRONTSPLIT BACKSPLIT awhile back you mentioned that g
GREATLY affected the doubles? The logic always doesn't hold.

bmehmet

The following EXCLUDES F+F - B+B - S+S - F+B - F+S - B+S doubles since FSB/FBS dominate

EXAMPLE

899,288,688 (3)

699,088 (2)

118,25,889 (3)

007 (1)

199,399,488,788 (4)

005,116,223 (3)

bmehmet

State GA

007,008,336,448,669,778 (6)

001,002,003,006,115,118,224,225,334,335,337,

338,449,556,667,889 (16)

lotogoblin

ALOT OF INFO! love it! I appreciate your dedication

bmehmet

@$money$#90170

We did add it in testing. But it created a major problem with the current SINGLE winner patterns. The DOUBLES act completely difference from the SINGLE numbers.

DOUBLES often produce different HIT/MISS and PAIR patterns. To remedy this, we inserted them into specific pairs PAIRS not necessarily suited for them.

The tricky thing is that the DOUBLES do have a hand in the next winner. Especially if it is a SINGLE number winner. And they come in sequence. So we can't put them in their separate section.

HOWEVER, we could simply create an additional page VIEW specifically for the DOUBLES where they have their own PAIR patterns and filters that involved only TWO and THREE patterns.

INTERESTING

IF we created a separate CHART VIEW and FILTERS for DOUBLES, the current SINGLE pair patterns can be used to further reduce the numbers. For example, currently the past SINGLE winners can contain PAIR patterns that often produce the next DOUBLE winner. THUS, if BOTH the current SINGLES pair pattern is COMBINED with a new DOUBLES pair pattern, it can produce a result that drastically reduces the DOUBLE numbers without removing the winner.

THIS can be accomplished similar to COMBINING L1 and M3C where the winner number MUST be in BOTH L1 and M3C to win. IF not then it is impossible that number will be the winner. Works 100%.

HERE, the SINGLES pair pattern would have to produce an IDENTICAL number that the DOUBLES pair pattern to be the WINNER. This absolutely could work. Because the DOUBLES have their own HIT/MISS and PAIR patterns as opposed to the SINGLES numbers.

FOR EXAMPLE,

What we can also do is simply CHANGE the PAIR patterns when DOUBLES are isolated.

THIRD CHART COLUMN

Another option is to create a 3rd DOUBLES PAIR COLUMN next to the SINGLES pair columns. This way members can see all PAIR patterns at a glance.