Interesting 🤔

tw

@bmehmet Hey Dave. I noticed something that idk if this is known to the group. When the pairsums are isolated, I look at the last drawing and notice draws that follow that number are the same. In some cases it reduces the numbers to play a lot. For example, I'm working on Kansas this morning. Last draw in the 11 3,1 isolation was 567. While it is in isolation mode for 11 3,1... drawings that follow 567 only... are 568,567,677. I use basic lottodds for this information because it goes further back.

free image hosting

tw

Idk if im explaining this clear..but i noticed this happens a lot. A lot of the time it is the exact same number. Even in some cases it will tell you if the number is likely to be single or double as well.

bmehmet

I’ll take a look

rjarias

bmehmet David : I'm having the same PROBLEM I had a month ago .A few days after being charged the regular $9.95 LO monthly fee I am unable to access the regular LO software and asked to make a payment again (I'm charged the $9.95 every 5th ) I'm also subscribed to AutoPredict but I'm charged on a different date.Please fix the issue ASAP just like you did last month.Thank you

tw

bmehmet see, Kansas was 9 2,1 .. 615... in the photo I sent you. This happens often for every state. I've been studying all week.

tw

bmehmet I've also noticed when 2 of the same pairs come out back to back...when you check the history of drawings that follow the same pattern... the pair that ends up coming next is usually in the past 10 drawings(In all cases except 1 it has been the past 5 drawings). So it's telling you exactly what to play. The second photo I sent has a column on the top labeled 7/7.
Those are pairs that came after double 7s. I've also noticed this with 8s and 9s. Ive tried this way a few times this week and 7 out of 9 states had the correct pair and 8 pairsum in them and with that I was able to get the winning numbers. .. ooo n also when checking the last drawing in different number order..it also usually favors a draw count. In the 2nd image A high draw count was most likely.

bmehmet

rjarias

Try this. Goto the subscription page and click the "SAVE CHANGES" member have said it works. It tells the computer to check that the payment has been made and activate.

tw

This is my method for D.c we will see what comes out, its not always correct but 7 out 9 tries..ill take my chances..lol. Notice under 11 3,1 there are only doubles... or some cases 8 pairsums after a specific drawing all contain the same number...for example under 9 1,2 most numbers that follow 348 (while 9 1,2 is isolated) only have 8s. I've been noticing a lot of things. Especially with D.c, with consecutive 8s, the following drawing is likely to have an 8 pairsum ending in 1. It's amazing what I'm noticing.

bmehmet

You are working on finding the winning number. You should work on finding the winning PAIRSUM. The program will give you the winning number.

In fact, you only have to figure out which of the 5 pairsums will hit within 3 draws.

tw

Lol. Again it was 382 in the list of numbers under 9 1,2 😅

bmehmet

You should make a video

tw

See I did Nj for tonight and 9 3,3 is within the last 10 draws after consecutive 9s.... but it's usually before that.. and the only number under 9 3,3 is 777....which came out again tonight.. but often its the same numbers that are repeated .., but works best with consecutive pairsums(because it helps me determine which one is more likely to come out Than other ways ive tried)..but i notice the other pairsums, they also like to repeat pairs or specific numbers... will make a video tomorrow...

tw

Part 1

Part 2

tw

Part 3

Part 4

tw

I made videos for anyone who may be curious about what I've noticed. I tried to explain the best I can, please let me know if I need to clarify anything. No it is not correct every time, but it has been spot on a lot. D.c and A.z are my favorite states for this, but I've tried multiple ones and it helps a lot. The video is clear on my end, (Android)

bmehmet

Thank you. Will review

blackyukongirl

tw thanks for taking time to show us this 🙂

tw

This time for ct it was wrong. It was actually a 10 "2,3". But "10" pairsum did show up in the top 5. Now I have to figure out how I can get more accurate with the "8pairsums". Because the last time it didn't have the correct "8 pairsums", but the correct "pairsums" were within the top 5 still. So I'm seeing if it's best to narrow it down to the top 3 repeated "pairsums" and then using other methods to determine the "8pairsum" part.

tw

But if you were looking for 10 2,3.... the numbers that followed the last drawing isolated are these numbers ...... 062 is what came out.. the last time 026 came out After a 224(last 10 2,3) it also started as a zero is straight order. This happens a lot.

tw

And it would have been a red number. Sometimes it is the black ones, but this is significant for if you are looking for a specific pairsum or 8pairsum .... helps me decide if i want to play extra on a number when it is also listed using the isolation method. I've been checking different consecutive sums for different states all week.. the isolation method numbers alone repeat often, sometimes back to back..