Hello,
As the title implies this is just an alternative, no one has to use it if they don't like it. I don't want anyone jumping out a window over this. I haven't done a formal statistical analysis on this but after doing a cursory review of probably a hundred draws over several states it seems to hit at least 60% of the time or greater within 3 draws of the trigger being identified. OK, so this strategy has a few advantages.
1. Its ridiculously simple. This is in and of itself, significant.
2. It only predicts, one, LWD which is 0, so you only have to focus on one, LWD, not two.
3. It triggers off any double. This is significant in two ways. First 270 doubles occur more frequently than 48 variations of boxed numbers. Second Since the trigger is doubles, one can argue that doubles could then be removed from any further LWD reduction since they just hit.
4. Without any further reduction you would be at 36 boxed numbers. Lottodds reduction methods could be used to further reduce the group. I'm also working on a novel reduction method where the numbers from the last draw tend not to occupy their same position on the next draw. You have to convert the boxed numbers to singles and then remove one digit from each column which can further reduce the amount of numbers played.
5. Oh and the strategy, its so simple I almost forgot. Simply wait for a double, then play your LWD 0 reduced number set for 3 draws.
